As Nature well knows, being a host — or publisher — of data is expensive. Keeping a platform technologically up to date is costly, as are data validation and curation. The running costs of the preprint server arXiv in 2017 are about US$1.3 million, for example, and the 2015 budget of the UK Data Archive was about £5.5 million ($8.2 million). For too long, public discussions have overlooked the true costs of data openness. More tangible support from governments and funders would work wonders.
Roadmap : A Research Data Management Advisory Platform - Données de la Recherche - 0 views
-
The DMPTool and DMPonline were developed to meet an emerging need arising from the advent of open data policies and each is now well established as the resource for researchers seeking guidance in creating data management plans (DMPs) in the US and UK respectively. Both services, and their sponsoring organizations, the California Digital Library (CDL) and the Digital Curation Centre (DCC), have succeeded in enabling researchers to comply with funder requirements in producing DMPs. However, this is just one step along the road to advancing open science.
Open Science - défis et opportunités: Une journée thématique nationale - 1 views
Open data report - 0 views
Empty rhetoric over data sharing slows science : Nature News & Comment - 1 views
-
-
funders, researchers and journals have much work to do to improve the transparency and reproducibility of research by means of data accessibility.
D-Lib Magazine - 1 views
Repscience 2016 - 2 views
NESTA-RIN_Open_Science_V01_0.pdf - 0 views
FOSTER - Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research - 0 views
ec-rtd_os_skills_report_final_complete_2207_1.pdf - 0 views
1 - 14 of 14
Showing 20▼ items per page